Examples of Different Styles of Rating Guides
The following are examples of rating guide formats. In truth, there is virtually no limit to the number of variations, but we’ve tried to include several useful formats to meet differing needs.
Rating Guide - Example A
|
|
Definition |
Ability to effectively manage and guide group efforts. Includes providing appropriate level of feedback concerning group progress. Leading and supporting a team to achieve results. Builds short- and long-term relationships with people critical to work and project success. Relationships involve all those encountered at work. Is respected as a valid resource through consistent actions and behaviors. Builds relationships by bringing conflicts and disagreements into the open, as appropriate. Makes appropriate or acceptable compromises in order to meet goals and to gain cooperation from others. |
Question |
Please describe a situation in your career in which you built a team using members from separate workgroups. Be specific about the groups with which you worked, your common goal, the specific role you played in bringing everything together, and the outcome of the situation. |
Rating Criteria |
|
5 points: In addition to 4-point elements, response indicates that:
4 points: Response indicates that:
3 points: Response indicates that:
2 points: Response indicates that:
1 point: Response indicates that:
0 points: Response indicates that:
|
|
Interviewer’s notes on candidate’s response:
|
|
Candidate’s score on this question: __________ |
|
Reason(s) for assigning this score:
|
|
Rating Guide - Example B
|
|
Competency: Conflict Management & Mediation |
|
Definition |
Ability to effectively resolve disputes among others. Manages disagreements. Methods and style of dealing with disagreements. Requires the ability to remain impartial and unbiased. Help others resolve complex or sensitive disagreements and conflicts. Effectively lead a rational process of illuminating issues, enhancing understanding of divergent interests, and identifying common grounds for a workable solution. |
Question |
This position serves as a facilitator or coordinator of special projects and committees. In this role, you need to resolve differences of opinion among committee members regarding project issues. Please describe a situation in which you faced a similar challenge. Include the type of project and the differences of opinion. Be specific about the actions you took and what you said when resolving those differences. |
7 6 |
|
5 4 3 |
|
2 1 |
|
Interviewer’s notes on candidate’s response:
|
|
Candidate’s score on this question: __________ |
|
Reason(s) for assigning this score:
|
|
Rating Guide - Example C
|
|
Competency: Resource Management |
|
Definition |
Effectively organize multiple assignments, sometimes of a complex nature or involving competing priorities, to produce work products that are accurate, thorough, and on time. Ability to appropriately allocate a variety of resources, which may include, materials, money, facilities, and equipment. Requires the ability to assess needs and track progress for multiple customers. |
Question |
Tell us about a time when you were required to complete multiple assignments in the same time period. How did you handle the situation? Please be specific about the situation, the number of assignments, the actions you took, the reasons for those actions, and the result. |
Key Criteria |
|
(7 - 9 pts) |
Response covers in detail all of the elements listed. The situation described is highly complex, similar to what may be encountered in this position. Response indicates that the candidate fully understood and considered the issues involved, and that he/she took proactive steps to ensure timely completion of the assignments. |
(4 - 6 pts) |
Response covers at least 3 of the elements listed, but is less thorough than an exceptional response. The situation described is similar in complexity to what is routinely encountered in this position. Response indicates that the candidate understood the issues involved, and that he/she handled the situation satisfactorily. |
(1 - 3 pts) |
Response covers at least 3 of the elements listed, but is less thorough than an exceptional response. The situation described is similar in complexity to what is routinely encountered in this position. Response indicates that the candidate understood the issues involved, and that he/she handled the situation satisfactorily. |
Interviewer’s notes on candidate’s response:
|
|
Candidate’s score on this question: __________ |
|
Reason(s) for assigning this score:
|
|
Rating Guide - Example D
|
|
Addresses supervisory actions related to employee performance issues. Competency Cluster: Performance Management |
|
Question |
As supervisor, you are responsible for keeping your team’s morale and productivity up. This includes the potential for dealing with employees who display a negative attitude or perform poorly. Please describe a situation in which an employee you supervised was underperforming or hurting team morale with his or her attitude on the job. Be specific about how you addressed the employee, the actions you took, and the outcome of the situation. |
9 8 7 |
Response demonstrates superior aptitude for supervision and employee motivation. Should include:
|
6 5 4 |
Response demonstrates sufficient aptitude for supervision and employee motivation. Should include:
|
3 2 1 |
Response demonstrates inadequate experience with or aptitude for supervision or employee motivation. May include:
|
Interviewer’s notes on candidate’s response:
|
|
Candidate’s score on this question: __________ |
|
Reason(s) for assigning this score:
|
|